243
OT
FIHARUOHOM THUINT THT
XXO 10 IHAK BHT
.BEIMOJOO WHT SOT HTAT2 HO YAATHAOIR a'IPRULAN 27H
ejal dalub to nota30% oldmurt ofT
ynofob ere to soroï #allof mi rubrmet
.300damoll to
-¡avoflot » dtower2
to evitan a bra mabomodeli a at renoifise¶ «uor .[
.AlbxI To oniqmg edt at detrui s
at etaving s yĺTomiot acw tenolide9 qoy
edt bentot er dmatges dolife morì tremiget detrui do83 erit
ae 0031 Isey and nt quodanoй to yolob edt at estol sotio¶
Tierf a bris ataog digte to boltoq s rodis bra eldste200 8
stijan edt of eeldub aid bemiotieq er dotriw gniwub,azzot
ef,esilot to Jebaodairequa mindqsü art to noijostaites
reddo yjnavea to abrowqu to abned edd revo bajomoriq Bar
aisey led a hits own .Jnsegteй to dnet ont of selfstanoo
10 103 ko two bedomorq reitit aar genoidiƒeq qoy zajai
ed Inez doldw,vojeM-Jusayne2 Zner erit of stedto eviowd
erd ja anusy ovli to bobreg a rot blod of beuntinos
day end of bedomorq nedfut aaw ed dotrie to molderique
add zot viloeqao jeds at bedoa ybsería gaived,robamet to
eritrom mastuldi arrotvang
at solvea aid to botzeg olode est aniruIC)
bus flew Toroltijo% quoy outof soilot goodqnok odj
VIIUTAJ 101
faithfully performed his duties to the complete satisfaction of his superior officers, no complaint, either of neglect of duty, or of misconduct of any kind, having been made against him until the events hereinafter set forth occurred.
1908
4. On the 18th January your Petitioner was accused of having attempted to commit an unnatural offence with a Chinese constable (No.159) named Tsang Ku, and such accusation having been reported to the Government Authorities, and being believed, your Petitioner was suspended from duty and on the 20th January 1908 was dismissed from the Police Force as from the 1st day of February 1908.
5. The evidence upon which the said accusation was believed consisted of statements of the said Tsang Ku to the effect that your Petitioner had requested him to join with your Petitioner in committing the said unnatural offence, had subsequently met the said Tsang Ku, accompanied him to a street called Tung Wo Lane soon after mid-night, and had there, within the doorway of a house, attempted to commit the said offence; and also of statements by Police Sergeants Murison and Terrett to the effect that they had seen your Petitioner in the said doorway with his tunic and trousers unbuttoned and his person exposed, and had thereupon required him to accompany them to the Central Police Station.
6. The statement of the said Tsang Ku was entirely false and was, your Petitioner verily believes, founded upon a conspiracy between the said Tsang Ku and certain other members of the Hongkong Police Force who desired to effect your Petitioner's dismissal.
300danok
243
OT
}
FIHARUOHOM THUINT THT
XXO 10 IHAK BHT
.BEIMOJOO WHT SOT HTAT2 HO YAATHAOIR a'IPRULAN 27H
ejal dalub to nota30% oldmurt ofT
ynofob ere to soroï #allof mi rubrmet
.300damoll to
-¡avoflot » dtower2
to evitan a bra mabomodeli a at renoifise¶ «uor .[
.AlbxI To oniqmg edt at detrui s
at etaving s yĺTomiot acw tenolide9 qoy
edt bentot er dmatges dolife morì tremiget detrui do83 erit
ae 0031 Isey and nt quodanoй to yolob edt at estol sotio¶
Tierf a bris ataog digte to boltoq s rodis bra eldste200 8
stijan edt of eeldub aid bemiotieq er dotriw gniwub,azzot
ef,esilot to Jebaodairequa mindqsü art to noijostaites
reddo yjnavea to abrowqu to abned edd revo bajomoriq Bar
aisey led a hits own .Jnsegteй to dnet ont of selfstanoo
10 103 ko two bedomorq reitit aar genoidiƒeq qoy zajai
ed Inez doldw,vojeM-Jusayne2 Zner erit of stedto eviowd
erd ja anusy ovli to bobreg a rot blod of beuntinos
day end of bedomorq nedfut aaw ed dotrie to molderique
add zot viloeqao jeds at bedoa ybsería gaived,robamet to
eritrom mastuldi arrotvang
at solvea aid to botzeg olode est aniruIC)
bus flew Toroltijo% quoy outof soilot goodqnok odj
VIIUTAJ 101
faithfully performed his duties to the complete satisfact- ion of his superior officers, no complaint, either of neglect of duty, or of misconduct of any kind, having been made against him until the events hereinafter get
forth occurred.
1908
4. On the 18th January your Petitioner was accused of having attempted to commit an unnatural offence with a Chinese constable (No.159) named Tsang Ku, and such accusation having been reported to the Government Authorities, and being believed, your Petition- er was suspended from duty and on the 20th January 1908 was dismissed from the Police Force as from the 1st day
of February 1908.
5. The evidence upon which the said accusation
was believed consisted of statements of the said Tsang Ku to the effect that your Petitioner had requested him to join with your Petitioner in committing the said unnatural offence, had subsequently met the said Tsang Ku, accompanied him to a street called Tung Wo Lane soon after mid-night, and had there, within the doorway of a house, attempted to commit the said offence; and also of statements by Police Sergeants Murison and Terrett to the effect that they had seen your Petitioner in the said doorway with his tunic and trousers unbuttoned and his person exposed, and had thereupon required him to accompany them to the Central Police Station.
6. The statement of the said Tsang Ku was
entirely false and was, your Petitioner verily believes, founded upon a conspiracy between the said Tsang Ku and certain other members of the Hongkong Police Force who
desired to effect your Petitioner's dismissal.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.